<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AGXcellent? Not Quite Yet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://priour.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/agxcellent-not-quite-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://priour.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/agxcellent-not-quite-yet/</link>
	<description>The (mis)Adventures of a self-taught developer</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morten</title>
		<link>http://priour.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/agxcellent-not-quite-yet/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://priour.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/agxcellent-not-quite-yet/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;Bottom line is that this is NOT going to truly challange GE/VE
It was never meant to challange GE/VE.
Instead AGX probably came to life as a demand from the customer after seing GE/VE, and now want to be able to use that kind of visualization on their GIS data, but still strictly being a GIS tool, and not the "playtoy" GE and VE is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Bottom line is that this is NOT going to truly challange GE/VE<br />
It was never meant to challange GE/VE.<br />
Instead AGX probably came to life as a demand from the customer after seing GE/VE, and now want to be able to use that kind of visualization on their GIS data, but still strictly being a GIS tool, and not the &#8220;playtoy&#8221; GE and VE is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
